The clothing industry is a hotbed for exploitative working conditions and environmental damage, of which affluent global North countries remain a substantial driver. The circular economy is a potential solution to these issues, but its social implications remain unclear. Using the UK as a case study, this article analyses the global social impacts of a transition to circular clothing economies in the global North, finding these to be (almost) entirely dependent upon the intentions and design of the associated policies and governance, as well as broader socio-economic changes. Some aspects of a transition will be unambiguously good for some people; others will only be beneficial with careful governance. Moreover, entrenched global economic inequalities leave trade-offs borne largely by the global South, highlighting the need for circular economy research — its drive for localization notwithstanding — to look globally to consider how a fair transition can be achieved.
In this article, we aim to provide a synopsis of the global social impacts that may accompany a transition to sustainable, circular clothing economies in the global North, thus assessing whether these are likely to be as positive as CE discourse often assumes. We focus upon the UK so as to build upon recent work developing sustainability scenarios for the UK clothing economy —scenarios underpinned by circular economy interventions. These circular interventions are necessary, but not sufficient, for environmental sustainability — the possibility of an environmentally unsustainable circular economy is something we recognise, but do not explore here, where we focus instead upon the associated social impacts. To this end, we draw upon methods and literature from various disciplines, including social lifecycle assessment, social footprinting, theories of human needs, social anthropology, and environmental justice. A key message of this analysis is that assessing the social impacts of even a single industrial sector, such as clothing, requires this analytical diversity; no one method, framework, or perspective is superior. Accordingly, this article does not provide a detailed analysis of social impacts by formally applying a single method such as social lifecycle assessment. Instead, we draw upon various existing studies to qualitatively assess the current social impacts of the UK clothing system, and how these may change if the UK (or similar global North countries) adopted circular clothing production and consumption practises in the future. We devote particular attention to the risks a ‘bad’ circular transition may pose to people if the impacts are not scrutinised—a perspective that is rarely taken in the CE literature we review in our analysis.
Read the full journal article here.
Millward-Hopkins J. The Social Implications of Circular Clothing Economies in the Global North. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16):7094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167094